Rope (1948)
496 views

The following film has been approved for all audiences by the independant film rating association of america

HD

Video Player ERROR!

Please Download the file
Loading...
DOWNLOAD IN HD 1080P WATCH IN HD

Rope (1948)


Genre
:
Crime | Thriller
Rating
:
8 / 10
Release Date
:
11 March 1948
Resolution
:
1920x1080
Duration
:
1 : 21 minutes
Spoken Language
:
English
Status
:
Released
Overview
:
Two men attempt to prove they committed the perfect crime by hosting a dinner party after strangling their former classmate to death.

Cast Overview :

Rupert Cadell
by: James Stewart
Brandon Shaw
by: John Dall
Phillip Morgan
by: Farley Granger
Mr. Henry Kentley
by: Cedric Hardwicke
Mrs. Anita Atwater
by: Constance Collier
Kenneth Lawrence
by: Douglas Dick
Mrs. Wilson
by: Edith Evanson
David Kentley
by: Dick Hogan
Janet Walker
by: Joan Chandler
Man Walking in Street After Opening Credits (uncredited)
by: Alfred Hitchcock

Member Reviews :

Can't believe I'm only seeing this now. It's great. Basically a play. There couldn't have been more than 15 shots. Ending had me in tears. Shouts out
  tmdb47633491
Rope was the first Alfred Hitchcock/James Stewart collaboration. They would go on to do "Rear Window", "The Man Who Knew Too Much", and finally, "Vertigo". This being the first, and also a kind of experimental film on Hitchcock's part, it is the weakest of the four. Shot as a play, mainly in one room, and with only a handful of cast members, the concept of how it was done is intriguing even today. Done in roughly a dozen takes, the only times that the camera ever cuts are when it closes in on someone's back and then angles around to the other side. That's the tell-tale sign of the only cuts in the entire film. John Dall's acting is commendable, in the part of the more ruthless killer, Brandon Shaw. He's a very cool character, and feels no guilt over the brutal murder he's just committed. James Stewart, great as he is, seemed a bit out of his element, as intellectual publisher Rupert Cadell. Stewart is always immensely enjoyable, and I have massive respect for his talent. However, he does appear somewhat uncomfortable with his part throughout the film. Another aspect that detracts from the tension is the opening scene of the murder taking place. After David Kentley is dead, he is placed in the wooden chest and the audience knows he's dead from scene 1. Had Hitchcock omitted the scene of the murder, the audience would no doubt be wondering "Is there really a body in that chest? Did they really do it? What's going on here?" And the red herrings in the film would only add to the suspense. As it is, we know from the start who's dead and who-done-it. That said, it's a decent movie, and certainly still worth the watch.
  barrymost